The mechanical rights agency charges that the digital trade group DiMA failed to propose a rate for the streams in the Copyright Royalty Board’s upcoming proceeding, which suggests they’re trying to get out of paying any royalties for the past five years.
Apparently that’s a no-no for the folks at Harry Fox Agency.
The failure to seal a licensing deal could conceivably lead to copyright infringement suits by publishers against digital services not covered by any license.
MusicNet was initially covered by an agreement reached in 2001 between HFA and the RIAA, which represented labels with ownership interests in services like MusicNet, whose owners included BMG Music, EMI Music and Warner Music Group. The online services agreed to pay royalties once rates were set through negotiations. Royalties would then be paid retroactive to the 2001 agreement
TOP 50: TAY'S THREE-PEAT, DUA'S OPTIMISM AND MORE
The most popular POETS in history (5/10a)
| ||
THE NEW UMG
Gosh, we hope there are more press releases.
TIKTOK BANNED!
Unless the Senate manages to make this whole thing go away, that is.
THE NEW HUGE COUNTRY ACT
No, not that one.
TRUMP'S CAMPAIGN PLAYLIST
Now 100% unlicensed!
|