Advertisement
 Email

 First Name

 Last Name

 Company

 Country

TIKTOK'S OLE OBERMANN: THE HITS INTERVIEW
He makes TikTok tick. (11/27a)
THE 2024 HITS LIST TURKEY TROT
...with all the trimmings (11/28a)
NEAR TRUTHS: WITCHING HOUR
Casting a spell (11/21a)
KENDRICK’S GNX: SONG BY SONG
Looking under the hood of surprise album (11/26a)
NEAR TRUTHS: EXPECT THE UNEXPECTED
One name keeps popping up amid the Roan-related speculation. (11/26a)
NOW WHAT?
We have no fucking idea.
COUNTRY'S NEWEST DISRUPTOR
Three chords and some truth you may not be ready for.
AI IS ALREADY EATING YOUR LUNCH
The kids can tell the difference... for now.
WHO'S BUYING THE DRINKS?
That's what we'd like to know.
Pub Crawling
BMI COMES OUT ON TOP
9/16/16

An order issued by federal Judge Louis Stanton has rejected the Department of Justice's controversial interpretation of the BMI consent decree, giving BMI the freed to engage in fractional licensing of music.

A scanned copy of the ruling can be found here.

If you need to get up to speed, know that the DOJ decided to not alter the consent decree for ASCAP and BMI as it pertained to digital licensing, and the two PROs could not do fractionalized licensing, meaning that any song with multiple rights holders represented by different PROs could be OK’d by one rights owner without the consent of the other(s). Understandably, feathers were ruffled, so this ruling proves to be quite the accomplishment.

“As we have said from the very beginning, we believed our consent decree allowed for the decades-long practice of fractional licensing and today we are gratified that Judge Stanton confirmed that belief," said BMI President & CEO Mike O’Neill (pictured). "Our mission has always been to protect the interests of our songwriters, composers and publishers, and we feel we have done just that. Today’s decision is a victory for the entire music community.”