Quantcast
Advertisement
 Email

 First Name

 Last Name

 Company

 Country
CAPTCHA code
Captcha: (type the characters above)

GRAMMY CHEW: RAP EDITION
They call it a comeback. (10/3a)
A FETCHING TOP 20
Just like old times. (10/3a)
SWIFT SCORES RATINGS TD FOR NFL
Waiting all week for Sunday night (10/3a)
RCA PROMO IS FULLY IN CON-TROLL
Class reunion (10/3a)
U2'S DESERT BLOOM
Rockin' Atomic City (10/3a)
AI: RISKS AND REWARDS
How the biz might use this powerful new tech—and the threats it could pose.
HOW LONG WILL TRUMP'S PRISON SENTENCE BE?
Oh, sorry... we were just daydreaming.
RAINMAKERS 2023
The stories behind the biggest industry careers.
HITS' 37th ANNIVERSARY
How are we still here?
Pub Crawling
STURM UND DRANG OVER STREAMING AND DOLLARS
8/2/16

The streaming market’s dawning maturity and the escalation of the streaming wars naturally go hand in hand, as you’ve read elsewhere in this issue. For publishers and writers the subject is a source of much sturm und drang, as compensation on the non-master side is a paltry fraction of the streaming-money pie.

Apple recently tweaked Spotify by floating a simple 9.1 cents per 100 streams in a proposal to the Copyright Royalty Board. This apparent bid for transparency would, of course, jam up the Swedish giant due to the vast number of steams on its lower-compensating free tier (as some industry insiders have been saying).But there are also difficulties for pubcos and tunesmiths in this formulation, partly related to scale. Even the rosiest scenario is a difficult one, made all the more galling since songs are the wellspring for all this burgeoning business.

Publishers are a resilient lot, and even in the midst of such a conundrum most of the folks I’ve spoken to sound remarkably optimistic. New revenue opportunities—including new ways to profit from streaming—will certainly emerge. But sooner would be better than later