Quantcast

Downloads Not Public Performances

A PERFORMANCE OR NOT A PERFORMANCE? The Supreme Court let stand on Monday a ruling that Internet downloads of sound recordings do not constitute a public performance of the recorded musical work under federal copyright law. The justices refused to review a ruling by a N.Y. appeals court to that effect. ASCAP had appealed the ruling, saying it has profound implications for its members, costing them tens of millions of dollars in potential royalties each year. The performing rights org had argued that digital downloads were also public performances for which copyright owners must be compensated. But a federal judge and the appeals court rejected that argument. At issue was a section of the Copyright Act stating that to perform a work means to recite, render, play, dance or act it either directly or by means of any device or process. "Music is neither recited, rendered nor played when a recording (electronic or otherwise) is simply delivered to a potential listener," the appeals court ruled. The appeals court also decided that fees paid by Yahoo and RealNetworks for licenses to play music on the Internet should be recalculated. That part of the ruling was not at issue before the Supreme Court. (10/4p)

NEAR TRUTHS:
SPRING BLOOMS
Here come the big guns. (3/29a)
THE COUNT: COLDPLAY IS HOT, COUNTRY'S COOKIN' IN THE U.K.
The latest tidbits from the bustling live sector (3/29a)
CITY OF HOPE TAPS MARCIANO FOR TOP HONOR
This year's philanthropic model (3/28a)
TRUST IN THE TOP 20
Hip-hop is no longer hibernating. (3/27a)
UMG BROADENS SPOTIFY OFFERINGS
Sir Lucian and Daniel are in harmony. (3/28a)
THE NEW UMG
Gosh, we hope there are more press releases.
TIKTOK BANNED!
Unless the Senate manages to make this whole thing go away, that is.
THE NEW HUGE COUNTRY ACT
No, not that one.
TRUMP'S CAMPAIGN PLAYLIST
Now 100% unlicensed!
 Email

 First Name

 Last Name

 Company

 Country
CAPTCHA code
Captcha: (type the characters above)