Quantcast
 Email

 First Name

 Last Name

 Company

 Country
CAPTCHA code
Captcha: (type the characters above)

MERCURY ORBITS AJR
The Met brothers have a new label home. (5/17a)
NEW RELEASES: KING
KENDRICK RETURNS
Another record-breaking debut week. (5/17a)
PRIDE & JOY
From the archives (5/17a)
NEW & DEVELOPING ARTISTS: Q2 EDITION
Place your bets here. (5/17a)
STREAMING SONGS: SUMMER HEAT
His lucky number is 23. (5/16a)
SUPERSTAR RELEASES
Who's next?
MUSIC BIZ SPECIAL
It's Comic-Con for numbers geeks.
THE BIG CHEESE
Theories of evolution from 30,000 feet.
THE NEXT GIANT DEAL
A&R in overdrive.
Blighty Beat
STREAMERS TUTOR THE GOV'T
2/24/21

Spotify, Apple Music and Amazon got technical in discussing streaming’s sale vs. rental debate and alternative remuneration models at the U.K. Government’s ongoing inquiry into the economics of streaming.

Tuesday’s session heard from Spotify’s Head of Global Affairs and Chief Legal Officer, Horacio Gutierrez, Apple Music’s Global Senior Director of Music Publishing, Elena Segal, and Amazon Music’s Director of International, Paul Firth.

Whether a stream is a sale or a rental has been a hotly contested issue in previous sessions and yesterday’s interviewees were posed the question. According to music:ally, Gutierrez said “renting has certain economic and legal connotations that I think are not 100% applicable to our scenario.” Segal said she sees streaming as a license: “We have a right, we have licenses that entitle us to sub-license to consumers and that’s always been true with music.”

Firth said that streaming is neither. “Streaming is something different, and trying to qualify it as something from the old world… it’s a classic square peg, round hole moment.”

…Read more